The Right to Information is a powerful tool, but a vague application gets a vague reply. LegalRaahi drafts precise RTI requests, tracks the thirty-day timeline, and files first and second appeals when the public authority delays or denies information.
"A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer ... of the concerned public authority ..." — Section 6(1), Right to Information Act, 2005
The RTI Act gives every citizen the right to seek information from a public authority. The request must be specific, addressed to the correct Public Information Officer, and accompanied by the prescribed fee. You do not have to give a reason for seeking the information.
The authority must respond within thirty days, or within forty-eight hours where the information concerns the life or liberty of a person. If the reply is delayed, incomplete, or refused without a valid exemption, the first appeal lies to the appellate authority within the department.
If the first appeal fails, the second appeal goes to the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission. The Commission can order disclosure, impose a penalty on the officer, and award compensation in appropriate cases.
Sets out the application, response timeline, exemptions, first appeal, and second appeal.
Hears second appeals and complaints, and can order disclosure and penalise delay.
A missed deadline is itself a ground for appeal.
| Stage | Authority | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Public Information Officer | 30 days; 48 hours for life or liberty |
| First appeal | First Appellate Authority | Within 30 days of the reply or deadline |
| Second appeal | CIC or SIC | Within 90 days of the first appeal decision |
| Penalty | Information Commission | ₹250 per day, up to ₹25,000 |
| Complaint | Information Commission | For refusal, delay, or unreasonable fee |
A request for all files invites a refusal. We frame specific questions with dates, file numbers, and periods.
We calendar the 30-day response, the first appeal, and the 90-day second appeal so no right is lost.
A first appeal is not a repetition. We address the exemption claimed and the public interest in disclosure.
We appear before the CIC or SIC, present the record, and press for disclosure and penalty.
Where information is genuinely exempt, we tell you early and reframe the request instead of wasting a filing.
We keep the identity and purpose of the request confidential to the extent the law allows.
A precise request, a tracked timeline, and an appeal that addresses the actual refusal.
We identify the correct public authority and PIO, and confirm the exact records, dates, and file numbers to ask for.
Within 48 hoursWe draft the application with precise questions, pay the fee, and file online or by post with proof of submission.
1–3 daysWe monitor the response period and review the reply for completeness, exemption claims, and transfer to another authority.
30 daysIf the reply is late, incomplete, or refused, we file the first appeal with the appellate authority within 30 days.
Within 30 daysWe file the second appeal within 90 days, appear before the Commission, and pursue disclosure, penalty, and compensation.
Final stageThe more precise the background, the stronger the request and the appeal.
Important: Never ask for all information or all files. Specific, dated requests are harder to refuse and easier for the Commission to order.
We convert a broad grievance into numbered, dated, file-specific questions.
Every response, appeal, and Commission date is calendared and tracked.
We address the exemption claimed instead of repeating the original request.
We appear before the CIC and SIC and press for disclosure and penalty.
If the record is exempt, we say so and suggest a lawful alternative.
"My earlier applications were rejected as vague. LegalRaahi reframed the request with file numbers and dates, and the information came within a month."
"The PIO claimed an exemption that did not apply. The first appeal was drafted around the exact clause, and the appellate authority ordered disclosure."
"The department ignored two requests. The Commission not only ordered the information but also imposed a penalty on the officer."
"We needed data for a public health campaign. The team handled the request and the appeal without any drama, and the data was released."
Let our family law experts handle every legal detail so you can focus on what matters most — your new life together. Free consultation, transparent pricing, complete confidentiality.
Mon–Sat: 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM · Response within 30 min